Google

US law firm targets high-growth hedge fund community

US law firm targets high-growth hedge fund community

US law firm targets high-growth hedge fund community

Tannenbaum Helpern Syracuse & Hirschtritt is opening its first international office in the UK.


We bring this expertise to the fast-growing London community of hedge fund managers, law firms and other professionals.

Michael G. Tannenbaum
Founding partner
Tannenbaum Helpern Syracuse & Hirschtritt


By Anna Rooke, OurWorld Editor

The new London base will enable Tannenbaum Helpern to access new and existing clients including hedge funds, law firms and accountancy firms.

It is the firm’s first expansion beyond its New York headquarters.

“There is a tremendous appetite in the UK-based hedge fund industry for specialised knowledge of and access to the US investment landscape and shifting regulatory environment,” said the firm's founding partner Michael G. Tannenbaum.

“We bring this expertise to the fast-growing London community of hedge fund managers, law firms and other professionals.”

Read the full story on Hedgeweek

Review planned for UK drug pricing scheme

Review planned for UK drug pricing scheme

The Pharmaceutical Price Regulation Scheme helps maintain a stable and supportive environment for drugs firms investing in the UK. How will a revised version aim to protect their interests?

Earlier this year, a report from the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) recommended that the UK Government’s pricing agreement with drug companies should be reviewed.

Currently the Pharmaceutical Price Regulation Scheme (PPRS) links pharmaceutical prices to production cost and caps profits that can be made by firms.

The OFT suggested that drug prices should instead be linked to their health benefits, rewarding the most effective treatments and increasing efficiency for the NHS.

Listening to industry concerns

The Department of Health has just announced that it will look to re-negotiate the PPRS with industry.

“Whilst we recognise the benefits that PPRS agreements have brought to the UK over the past 50 years, ministers believe it important to update the system so it is fit for purpose in the modern world and contributes to achieving greater efficiency in NHS expenditure,” said a spokesperson from the Department of Health.

However, the UK’s competitiveness minister has emphasised that industry concerns about a revision of the scheme will be central to a renegotiation.

“We are undertaking a continuing programme of detailed analysis of the OFT report’s proposals, and will discuss this analysis with the industry, taking into account their strong concerns about a number of the proposals,” he said.

Maintaining stability for investors

One of these concerns is that a future pricing scheme could affect the stable framework that attracts pharmaceuticals firms from around the world to the UK.

“It is important that, once introduced, a future pricing scheme provides stability, sustainability and predictability for industry,” commented Stephen Timms.

“OFT identified this as an important area and industry has stated on a number of occasions that the stability of the UK Market makes it an attractive place to invest.

“We want to ensure that the UK remains a stable market over the coming years.”

Increasing uptake of new drugs

Promoting the take-up of new and innovative treatments will also be a priority going forward.

The UK Government already spends more on R&D in health than any other government apart from the USA.

“It is in all of our interests that any pricing system will encourage research and reward innovation which delivers valuable new treatments,” said Timms.

US research firm expands drug development facilities

US research firm expands drug development facilities

Why has a global increase in outsourcing of drug development, prompted PPD to invest in it Scottish operations?

By Anna Rooke, OurWorld Editor.

Across the pharmaceutical, biotechnology and medical device sectors, companies outsource their drug discovery, development and post-approval services to PPD.

In recent years, PPD has noticed an increase an upward trend in outsourcing throughout these sectors, as companies look to offer innovative treatments more quickly to patients.

"With the biopharmaceutical industry increasingly relying on global outsourcing to speed drug development and reduce costs, demand for our services continues to grow," said Fred Eshelman, chief executive officer of PPD.

“Intellectual and technical resources”

Located in Strathclyde Business Park, PPD currently employs more than 350 staff in Scotland.


Scotland offers both intellectual and technical resources that make it an important hub for our global clinical research operations.

Fred Eshelman

Chief executive officer

PPD


Now it plans to invest up to £15 million to expand its offices in this location over the next three years.

"Scotland offers both intellectual and technical resources that make it an important hub for our global clinical research operations,” said Eshelman.

The company will be recruiting staff in specialist areas such as biostatistics, data management, pharmacovigilance, product development, and clinical trial management and monitoring.

Benefits to wider life sciences sector

PPD’s investment will have a knock-on effect for the Scottish life sciences industry at large, according to Jack Perry, chief executive of business development agency Scottish Enterprise.

"This project represents a highly valuable and very welcome development for the life sciences sector in Scotland.

"The presence of PPD enhances Scotland's international reputation, and we welcome this ‘vote of confidence' in Scotland's capabilities and technological base,” he commented.

PPD's expansion is being supported with a regional grant of £4.5 million.

Small firms thriving in the UK shows report

Small firms thriving in the UK shows report

Record numbers of SMEs are starting up in the UK. We look at the reasons why the UK’s regulatory framework, skills and new legislation are helping them to flourish.

There were an estimated 4.5 million business enterprises in the UK at the start of 2006, up 125,000 on the start of the previous year.

The figures have just been released by the UK’s Department of Business Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (BERR).

Numbers were up 2.9 per cent on the beginning of 2005 – the highest since the survey began back in 1994.

Setting up is easy

With international comparisons frequently ranking the UK as one of the easiest places in the world to start up a business, it is no wonder the numbers of SMEs are growing.

The World Bank rates the UK as the top country in Europe for ease of doing business and sixth out of 175 countries ranked throughout the world.

Looking into forming a company?

Find out how easy it is to register your UK firm in this factsheet.

The UK’s stable economic framework, supported by a transparent and business-friendly process to form a company contributes to the high levels of entrepreneurship.

Getting the right staff

An important factor to the success of firms starting up in any country is the flexibility with which they can employ the right workers.

The UK has a diverse workforce including an abundance of specialist skills to meet the needs of growing firms.

Labour market flexibility helps start-ups in the UK to take on more employees during start-up and growth periods.

And in recent years, an increasingly strong partnership between labour unions and business management has helped companies to resolve conflict with employees constructively and keep labour strikes to a minimum.

New legislation enhances

It’s all very well starting up a business, but what about making it work on a long-term basis?

The 2006 Global Entrepreneurship Monitor found the proportion of people running established businesses in the UK to be 93 per cent of the start-up rate, showing that the vast majority of ventures are successful.

How will the Companies Act impact on SMEs?

Learn about changes to corporate legislation and new reporting procedures for small firms in our article The short cut to setting up.

A further boost to small businesses will be delivered when the Companies Act 2006 is fully implemented in 2008.

Previously separate pieces of corporate legislation will be condensed into a single framework, with accounting and financial reporting procedures simplified for SMEs.

Manufacturing output continues to expand

Manufacturing output continues to expand

Manufacturing performance is at an eight-year high, car sales are accelerating and demand for UK exports is growing. Is UK manufacturing making a comeback?

Manufacturing output grew for a fourth consecutive month, its best sustained performance for eight years, the Office for National Statistics said yesterday.

The sector's contribution to UK economic growth was one per cent higher than the same period last year, undermining perceptions that the UK manufacturing base is dwindling.

The UK as a manufacturing base

Is the UK manufacturing sector really in decline? We explore negative perceptions of UK manufacturing and look at key indicators for its future performance.

“The increase partly reflects the hunger of accelerating European economies for British exports,” reported the Daily Telegraph.

One notable growth area is the automotive sector where, according to the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders, sales of new cars last month were up 4.9 per cent on 2006.

Read the Daily Telegraph’s report on the latest manufacturing data.

UK sets framework for communications convergence

UK sets framework for communications convergence

How is new regulation putting the UK ahead of other European countries in the development and take-up of convergent technologies?

A change in the UK law has removed restrictions on connecting home digital devices using ultra-wideband (UWB) technology.

The wireless technology enables the transfer of large amounts of data over distances of around 30 metres and previously required a license.

The decision was announced by UK regulator Ofcom.

Promoting market innovation

The move will enable device developers to launch the latest convergent devices in the UK market.

“Where possible, we want to remove restrictions on the use of spectrum to allow the market to develop new and innovative services – such as UWB – for the benefit of consumers,” explained Ofcom’s chief executive, Ed Richards.

UWB enables a variety of equipment – from computers and DVD players to cameras and mp3 players – to communicate without the need for cables.

Home hubs look likely

In taking this step, the UK is ahead of other European countries which still require licenses to use UWB technology.

However, market developments in other countries where the technology is already unlicensed, bode well for the UK.

In the USA and Japan for example technology companies have begun to develop and sell UWB products such as home hubs.

AIM outshines other growth markets

AIM outshines other growth markets

This week a Chinese property firm is floating on AIM, in favour of markets closer to home. How does AIM manage to attract more international firms than any of its global counterparts put together?

For smaller firms, growth markets offer the opportunity to raise finance with less stringent entry requirements and lower costs than the main markets.

Yet not all international growth markets are as accessible to start-up firms as others.


AIM needs only four to five months of preparation.

Li Tak-kwong

Chief executive

Libertas Capital


This week China’s Canton Property Investment chose a listing on London’s Alternative Investment Market (AIM) over Hong Kong’s Growth Enterprise Market owing to regulatory barriers.

Less time to prepare

AIM offers an “easier and faster alternative” for Chinese start-up firms looking to raise capital according to a report in the South China Post.

Speaking to the newspaper, Charles Li Tak-kwong, chief executive of UK corporate finance specialist Libertas Capital said that more Chinese firms were likely to follow in Canton’s footsteps.

"AIM needs only four to five months of preparation," he said.

"In Hong Kong, it takes a new listing candidate 12 to 18 months to be vetted and approved by the stock exchange and the Securities and Futures Commission."

Growing popularity

Earlier this month, AIM ranked as the most successful international growth market, attracting more listings than all its global rivals combined.

The total number of listed companies shot from 1,399 in 2005 to 1,643 in 2006, according to accountants Grant Thortons.


AIM has continued to gather momentum and credibility since the dot.com boom.

Philip Secrett

International director of capital markets

Grant Thornton


The US growth market Nasdaq saw listings fall in 2006, while other exchanges such as Singapore’s SESDAQ and India's Indonext experienced only modest growth.

Backed by investor confidence

For Philip Secrett, international director of capital markets at Grant Thornton, "AIM has continued to gather momentum and credibility since the dot.com boom.

“The market has fed off investor confidence and its location in London has been critical,” he said.

The market of choice for growth companies

Learn more about AIM’s popularity for international companies in this presentation.

The total value of companies on AIM rose by over 80 per cent last year.

Magnet for international firms

There are a total of 41 growth markets worldwide – 19 in Europe, 15 in Asia-Pacific, four in the Americas and three in Africa.

According to Secrett, what singles out AIM from the rest is its appeal to firms from all over the world.

"Globally, a mere handful of markets can be said to have truly succeeded in attracting new companies and in growing investor appeal beyond national borders,” he said.

Read coverage of Canton’s listing on AIM in the South China Post (subscription only).

Ericsson to open new R&D centre

Ericsson to open new R&D centre

The telecoms giant will continue to draw upon the UK’s abundance of skilled ICT workers as it executes a long-term expansion programme here.

Swedish telecoms firm Ericsson is to build a new £60 million research and development base in the West Midlands region of the UK.

Around 600 highly skilled workers will be located at the new centre, due to open in 2009.

"The new site at Ansty will enable us to create a brand new operating environment, specifically designed to suit the needs of our business both now and for the future,” said Jacqueline Hey, Ericsson UK’s managing director.

Need a location to develop your telecoms technology?

UK firms are some of the world’s biggest spenders on ICT R&D. Look at the locations they have chosen using this map.

“We recognise both the skills that we have in the UK and the importance of maintaining the capabilities we have.

"Ericsson is investing heavily into the UK and this is an important step securing employment in the area that is likely to create new job opportunities in Ansty.”

Find out more on the Birmingham Post website.

London tailors property development to start-up firms

London tailors property development to start-up firms

The UK capital is known as a world-class destination for large multinational firms, but can smaller companies find the flexibility they need to rent commercial space in central London?

By Anna Rooke, OurWorld Editor.

A new programme of property development will offer young companies flexible leases for office space in prime London locations.

Leases will start from as little as one year according to a report in the Financial Times.

Planned locations include Islington, Hackney, Tower Hamlets and other areas on the edge of London’s financial district, the Square Mile.

Read full details on the Financial Times website.

Why property? What you'll learn in this step: Sensible investments in property – residential or non-residential – have many benefits, including capita

Why property?

What you'll learn in this step: Sensible investments in property – residential or non-residential – have many benefits, including capital growth.

Property has been a popular route to wealth for many Australians for many years. Buying their own home is often the first ‘investment’ many people make; purchasing another property may well be the second – even before shares and other assets.

But your first investment in property needn’t be your home. Indeed, buying a small apartment to rent out can be a good way to accumulate funds so you can eventually buy your own place, in an area where you want to live.

Increasing numbers of young Australians are choosing this route, buying in one suburb while renting in a more desirable and expensive area – or living at home for a while longer.

Still others are diversifying into non-residential property via property trusts and syndicates.

Sensible investments in property have many attractions. Property can be less volatile than shares – though not always – and it tends to be regarded as a safe haven when other assets are declining in value.

It has the potential to generate capital growth (an increase in the value of your asset) as well as rental income. Then there’s the tax advantages associated with negative gearing (more about that later).

However, as with any investment, there are no guarantees. Property prices go down, as well as up, and sometimes tenants are hard to find – especially good ones who pay on time and take care of your investment.

Investors need to have a keen awareness of the interest rate environment – how higher rates might affect their expected net return and the market for their property should they wish to sell. They also need to make sure the return or ‘yield’ from their property stands up against the return they might have achieved had they invested in shares, for example.

Of course, you don’t have to make a direct investment in property. Pooling your funds with other investors in managed funds with a property focus, listed property trusts or property syndicates provides exposure to a broader range of property – including commercial, industrial and retail as well as residential – often with a smaller investment required.

Many financial advisers would argue that too many Australians let direct investment in residential property dominate their portfolios. In theory – and this is far from reality for most people – property should account for perhaps 10 per cent of an investment portfolio.

What you'll learn in this step: Returns come from capital growth and from rental income.

The potential return

What you'll learn in this step: Returns come from capital growth and from rental income.

Capital growth

Capital growth is the increase in the value of your property over time and is one of the main reasons people invest in residential real estate.

Historically, Australian residential property has experienced strong capital growth – the long-term average annual growth rate for property is about 9 per cent – but periods of stagnation and even decline are also part of the picture. The nature of the property cycle means real estate should probably be thought of as an investment with a 10-year horizon.

Take the experience in recent years. In 2003, Australian house prices were rising at a rate of about 20 per cent, but since then prices have come to a virtual standstill in many areas and have gone backwards fast in some of the hot spots.

Your best chance of achieving capital growth is buying the right property, in the right place, and – most importantly – at the right price.

Research current house prices. Keep an eye on sale and auction results in the papers, or buy reports on specific suburbs from researchers like Australian Property Monitors’ Home Price Guide (www.homepriceguide.com.au). Talk to real estate agents and observe at auctions.

Rental income and yield

You should apply the same standards to a property investment as to any other investment, ‘benchmarking’ the potential return against what you might achieve elsewhere.

An important measure is a property’s yield. That can be calculated by dividing the annual rent it generates by the price you paid for the property and multiplying that by 100 to get a percentage figure.

Let’s say you bought a unit for $400,000 and rented it out for $350 a week (or $18,200 a year). That’s a yield of 4.5 per cent. That might compare with a dividend yield of, say, 7 per cent had you invested in a particular company’s stock.

But let’s say you bought a worker’s cottage in a mining town where prices are low but the rental income as good as in the big city. Pay $350,000 and rent the property out for $600 a week and you’ll achieve a yield of 9 per cent.

Remember, yields fall as house prices rise (if rent doesn’t rise commensurably).

Keep an eye on vacancy rates – the proportion of properties sitting empty out of the total rental supply.

If landlords have to fight for tenants, they won’t have much ‘pricing power’ with regard to rent. However, if the rental market is tight, and tenants are competing for properties, they’ll be prepared to pay a bit more to get in the door.

A vacancy rate above 3 per cent is a warning sign, and it may pay to be wary of areas where there’s going to be a big increase in the supply of apartments.

In any case, build into your calculations of your likely return periods when you’ll be in between tenants.

What you'll learn in this step: Many people invest in property with the aim of taking advantage of Australia’s negative gearing rules.

Tax

What you'll learn in this step: Many people invest in property with the aim of taking advantage of Australia’s negative gearing rules.

Negative gearing

Gearing basically means borrowing to invest. Negative gearing is when the costs of investing are higher than the return you achieve. With an investment property, that’s when the annual net rental income is less than the loan interest plus the deductible expenses associated with maintaining the property (such as property management fees and repairs).

When you’re negatively geared you can deduct the costs of owning your investment property from your overall income – reducing your tax bill. High-income earners benefit the most, because they’re in the top tax bracket.

In addition, while you record a loss on the income from the property, in theory capital gains in the value of your property should make the investment worthwhile.

But don’t over-commit to property just to get a tax deduction. Those tax benefits generally don't come until the end of the financial year and you have to make your mortgage payments in the meantime.

That said, you can apply to have less tax deducted from your pay to take into account the impact on your overall income of expected losses on an investment property.

Say you earn $45,000 a year, gross, in your day job but you can reliably estimate that you'll make a $15,000 loss on an investment property. You can apply to have your tax payments calculated on an income of $30,000 rather than $45,000 – giving you more cash in hand now, rather than a refund at the end of the year. Get your sums wrong, though, and you’ll owe the tax man money at the end of the year.

See www.ato.gov.au for information about pay-as-you-go (PAYG) withholding payments.

Remember, too, that a capital gain – which will be taxed – is never assured. What’s more, the benefits of negative gearing are smaller when interest rates and inflation are low and can be offset by charges such as the land tax levied in NSW (see www.osr.nsw.gov.au).

Depreciation

The owners of investment properties can also claim depreciation of items such as stoves, refrigerators and furniture. That involves writing off the cost of the item over a set number of years – the ‘effective life’ of the asset.

The ATO sets out what it considers to be appropriate periods. The cost of a cooktop, for instance, is generally written off over 12 years – you claim one-twelfth of its cost as an expense each year.

There are two different types of depreciation – an allowance for assets such as the cooktop, and an allowance for capital works, such as the cost of construction.

It’s a good idea to talk to a quantity surveyor or other depreciation specialist right from the start, so you make full and correct use of the available depreciation allowances.

The higher the depreciation bill, the higher the amount to offset against income when you’re negative gearing.

Capital gains tax

Capital gains tax (CGT) is the tax charged on capital gains that arise from the disposal of an asset – including investment property, but not your place of residence – acquired after September 19, 1985.

You’re liable for CGT if your capital gains exceed your capital losses in an income year. (If you’re smart, you’ll time asset disposals so that if you really must take a capital loss it’ll be at a time when it can offset a capital gain).

The capital gain on an investment property acquired on or after October 1, 1999, and held for at least a year, is taxed at only half the rate otherwise. This means a maximum rate of 24.25 per cent if you’re in the highest tax bracket.

The capital gain is the profit you’ve made over and above the ‘cost base’ – the purchase price plus capital expenses such as subsequent renovations. Make sure you keep good records of these sorts of expenses.

Capital gains tax is a complex area, so it pays to get specific advice about how it applies in your individual circumstances.

Making your investment pay

If you hold your investment property for long enough, hopefully you’ll reach the stage where losses start turning into gains. The rent you’re charging should have risen over time, and you’ll be steadily whittling away at the mortgage.

Once your rental income exceeds your mortgage repayments you’ll no longer be negatively geared, however. And no negative gearing means no tax advantages – but that doesn't mean you should rush to sell.

Yes, you'll have to pay more tax because the income you're making is more than your losses – but the fact is you’re making money, which is why you invested in the first place.

The temptation may be to take your profits and plough them into another property – and that can be a perfectly reasonable strategy – but don't lose track of the costs involved in selling. Stamp duty alone is a big disincentive.

Selecting a property

Selecting a property

What you'll learn in this step: Good buys aren’t necessarily close to home.

Having worked through the financial considerations, and bearing in mind that you’re not actually going to live in the property, you should be able to make a fairly rational decision about where and what to buy.

You’ll want to benefit from as much capital growth as possible, so the first rule is to buy in a growth area.

That might be a suburb located within 10 kilometres of the city centre, or a suburb with special attractions such as a beach or trendy café strip. Proximity to a ‘hot’ suburb could mean your suburb will be next to rise in value.

It could even be a regional town supporting a booming industry.

Narrow your search down even further by looking at a property’s access to transport, shops and leisure facilities and its appeal to your market – whether they’re young professionals or blue-collar workers.

Another decision is what to buy – house or unit? old or new? Units usually are a much better proposition for landlords. They’re easier to rent out and easier to maintain: there's no lawn to mow, and when things go wrong in the building the expense is shared with the other owners.

Properties with a view are always more desirable than those without, and tenants like facilities such as balconies, internal laundries, undercover parking and security.

These sorts of facilities may not be available in an older property, which may have to compete with a new apartment building down the road with all the mod-cons.

If the property you’re interested in is already rented, ask about its history of tenancy. Have there been periods when it hasn't been occupied? If so, find out why. You don’t want to inherit those problems.

The bottom line: balance what you can afford to buy with the rent you’ll be able to charge. There’s no point buying a waterfront property if you can’t find tenants happy to pay the sort of rent you’ll need to make the exercise worthwhile.

Buying

Once you’ve found the right property, the actual mechanics of buying it will be the same as if you were buying a home to live in. See our guide to buying a home for what happens next, and for pointers on how much to borrower, where to borrow, and what types of loans are available.

There are few differences between borrowing for a home and borrowing for an investment property.

Some lenders charge a higher interest rate for investment properties because they say their risk is higher, but shop around and you should be able to get a rate that’s the same as for an owner-occupied property.

One option of particular interest to investors is the interest-only loan, where you don't pay off any of the principal, just the interest.

Such a loan can make it easier to estimate the true returns from a property. A tax advantage is that interest payments for investment properties are tax deductible, while payments off the principal are not.

One strategy that is being touted is to take out an interest-only loan and divert the money you would have paid off the principal to your tax-efficient superannuation fund. Upon retirement, you use your super pays off the loan. Remember, though, that this money is locked up until at least age 55 and you won’t have access to it if you strike a cash-flow problem.

Managing your property

Managing your property

What you'll learn in this step: It takes time, effort and money to look after a property.

It’s possible to manage a rental property yourself, and in so doing save a management fee that’s usually around 5 per cent of the rent. But it can be time-consuming and it's hard to remain emotionally detached when you have tenants ringing up complaining about every little thing, or you personally have to deal with damage to your property.

The other option is to use the services of a professional property manager. They’ll have up-to-date information on what’s happening in the market and what tenants are prepared to pay. They’ll have prospective tenants on their books, and experience vetting tenants. Because they manage many properties, they’ll have access to reputable trades people at cheaper service fees.

And their fees are tax deductible.

Insurance

Managing your financial risk as a property investor also involves insuring yourself against a myriad of potential hazards.

It’s up to your tenants to take out home contents insurance to cover their possessions, but you’ll need building insurance. Then there’s ‘landlord’ insurance, covering risks such as malicious or accidental damage to your property by a tenant, any legal liability should a tenant injure themselves, and lost rental income should tenants move out without paying.

Renovating

Be prudent about renovations. The colour palette of the kitchen in your investment unit may offend your sensibilities, but it only makes financial sense to replace it if a better kitchen will stop the unit sitting vacant or lift the rent you can charge.

Make a ‘cost-benefit analysis’ of your renovations. If the kitchen is going to cost $10,000, and you’ll have to borrow the money and pay interest, but it will only add $10 a week to the rent, it’s probably better left alone.

Don't ‘overcapitalise’ by spending too much on design, finishes and fittings.

What you'll learn in this step: Trusts and syndicates provide exposure to a broader range of property

What you'll learn in this step: Trusts and syndicates provide exposure to a broader range of property.

Pooling your funds with other investors in vehicles such as property trusts and property syndicates provides exposure to a broader range of property – including commercial, industrial and retail as well as residential – often with a smaller investment required.

You’ll be spreading your risk rather than being hostage to the ups and downs of the residential property cycle and you’ll still have access to tax advantages such as depreciation – but you won’t have to worry about kitchen colours and clumsy tenants.

Property trusts

Property trusts aim to generate rental income from a portfolio of professionally selected properties with good tenants on long leases, along with some capital growth in the value of those properties.

Property trusts can specialise in particular sectors – such as retail or industrial property – or they can be ‘diversified’, investing in various types of property.

They can be listed or unlisted. The advantage of investing in a trust listed on the stock exchange is that you should be able to sell part or all of your holding quickly – something that’s not so easy with your own bricks and mortar. But, like any investment, nothing is guaranteed.

Listed property trusts (LPTs) have blossomed in recent years and now account for something like 10 per cent of the Australian sharemarket’s value. A recent development is a push by LPTs into property assets overseas.

Iverson's $6.3 Million Listing

Iverson's $6.3 Million Listing

By CHRISTINA S.N. LEWIS
August 24, 2007; Page W6

NBA all-star Allen Iverson has listed his five-bedroom home in an exclusive Philadelphia suburb for $6.3 million.

[Go to slideshow]

The 32-year-old guard, one of the league's leading scorers, was traded to the Denver Nuggets last year after 10 ½ seasons with the Philadelphia 76ers.

[Allen Iverson]

Mr. Iverson and his wife, Tawanna, paid $5 million in 2003 for the roughly 14,000-square-foot home on four acres, public records show. It's located in Villanova, according to the listing, about 20 miles northwest of the city on Philadelphia's wealthy Main Line. Built in 1991, the four-level French-style house has arched palladian windows, a 12-person movie theater, a billiard room and a guest suite with a kitchenette. The master suite is decorated with crystal chandeliers and has a closet with room for 500 pairs of shoes. The property also has a pool house, a hot tub and a stream.

Chanel Overton, of Long & Foster Cos., has the listing. She declined to comment. Mr. Iverson's agent, Leon Rose, could not be reached for comment.

Record Producer Sells

Grammy award-winning producer James Harris III, known professionally as Jimmy Jam, sold his lakefront home in Minnesota in June for $7 million. The 24,000-square-foot home on 3.6 acres had been listed for over a year at $9 million.

A longtime Janet Jackson collaborator, Mr. Harris and his wife, Lisa, have relocated to Los Angeles, according to the co-listing agent, Meredith Howell, of Coldwell Banker Burnet.

[James Harris]

The seven-bedroom house is located on Lake Minnetonka in Minnetrista, about 25 miles west of Minneapolis. Mr. Harris paid $750,000 for the land in 1990, which has about 360 feet of lake frontage, and designed the two-story contemporary house himself. It has barrel-vaulted ceilings, an indoor and an outdoor swimming pool, a 16-seat screening room and two offices, as well as a 12-car garage. Mr. Harris could not be reached for comment.

The buyers are Christopher and Sandra Hintz, a local couple, who plan to live in the house year-round. While Mr. Harris took his numerous pianos and awards with him, he left more than 50 televisions that were bolted to the walls, according to Ms. Howell, who shared the listing with Ryan Burnet, a partner in their firm. Bruce Birkeland, also of Coldwell Banker, represented the Hintzes.

Mr. Harris and his producing and business partner, Terry Lewis, have dozens of platinum records to their name. In addition to producing albums for Janet Jackson, with whom they have won two Grammys, they have worked with Mariah Carey, Usher and Boyz II Men, among others. Earlier in their career they toured with Prince as members of The Time.

Write to Christina S.N. Lewis at christina.lewis@wsj.com

Bank of America Invests $2 Billion In Countrywide

Bank of America
Invests $2 Billion
In Countrywide

By JAMES R. HAGERTY, VALERIE BAUERLEIN and LINGLING WEI
August 23, 2007; Page A1

Bank of America Corp. acquired a $2 billion equity stake in Countrywide Financial Corp., a move aimed at dispelling a crisis of confidence among creditors and investors in the nation's largest mortgage company.

The deal, which received quick approval from regulators, provides a strong dose of security for Countrywide. In recent weeks, the company had struggled to raise the financing it needed to fund its business, stoking concerns among investors about its prospects and pummeling its stock. Worries about the health of Countrywide, which originates or funds roughly one out of every six mortgages in the U.S., have contributed to the recent tumult in financial markets.

News of the Countrywide deal came late yesterday afternoon, just hours after Wall Street investment bank Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. announced that it was closing down a subprime-lending business and two days after another big lender, Capital One Financial Corp., closed its GreenPoint mortgage arm. Those operations joined scores of small to midsize lenders that have collapsed over the past six months amid growing anxiety over a surge in home-loan defaults and a weakening housing market.

"Countrywide is a survivor," Angelo Mozilo, chief executive officer and co-founder of the Calabasas, Calif., company said in an interview late yesterday.

Though the deal doesn't give Countrywide automatic access to Bank of America's capital, it is likely to persuade investors that the company has a powerful ally ready to help in any crisis. And it removes a major source of uncertainty hanging over the nation's credit markets at a time when investor confidence has been shaky.

Mr. Mozilo said Countrywide would have survived without help from Bank of America but will be strengthened by this "vote of confidence to the world."

In after-hours trading yesterday, shares of Countrywide jumped $4.06, or nearly 19%, to $25.88.

Bank of America invested in Countrywide nonvoting convertible preferred stock yielding 7.25% annually. The preferred can be converted into common stock, subject to restrictions on trading for 18 months, at a conversion price of $18 a share. A full conversion would give Bank of America a 16% to 17% stake in Countrywide's common shares, Mr. Mozilo said.

Mr. Mozilo dismissed as "frivolous" for now any speculation that the investment could lead to a full merger between Bank of America and Countrywide, but he said the two companies would explore "where we can provide services to them better than they do themselves, and vice versa.... We'll continue discussions."

Countrywide had long argued that it would endure the current mortgage meltdown and emerge even stronger as competitors vanished. But the company was caught up last week in a storm of speculation as it found it could no longer tap the market for commercial paper, or short-term corporate IOUs, a major source of its financing, and a Merrill Lynch analyst warned in a report that it could face bankruptcy in a worst-case scenario. To shore up its finances, Countrywide borrowed $11.5 billion from a syndicate of 40 banks.

Though the capital injection from Bank of America is a big plus, investors shouldn't get "too euphoric," said Frederick Cannon, an analyst at Keefe, Bruyette & Woods in San Francisco, who expects Countrywide to post a sizable loss for the third quarter. Mortgage defaults and foreclosures are expected to keep rising over the next year or two as borrowers run into trouble on loans that started out with relatively low payments, only to "reset" later to much higher ones.

During the housing boom of the first half of this decade, Countrywide was a big promoter of pay-option adjustable-rate mortgages, known as option ARMs. These give borrowers several choices each month, including paying no principal and less than the full amount of interest normally due. If they take that route, their loan balance grows, setting them up for much higher payments later on. Countrywide's banking arm holds $27.8 billion of option ARMs on its books. Payments were 30 days or more overdue on 5.7% of these loans as of June 30, compared with 1.6% a year earlier.

Countrywide reduced its subprime lending -- or lending to borrowers with shaky credit histories -- to 4% of loans originated in the second quarter from 10% a year earlier. But it retains exposure to many past subprime and other risky loans sold to other parties.

When loans are packaged into securities and sold, lenders such as Countrywide often keep a portion of the securities known as "residuals." This portion bears the first losses from defaults. As of June 30, Countrywide had $1.46 billion of those residuals, whose value will drop or even vanish if defaults continue to mount rapidly.

Mr. Mozilo noted that Bank of America has provided financing for Countrywide's lending since 1970, shortly after the founding of the home-loan company. He declined to specify when the two sides began discussing the equity investment but said it came together "over a relatively short period of time," and that regulators were kept informed.

The investment puts Bank of America much more deeply into the turbulent but sometimes highly profitable home-mortgage market. In the first half of this year, Bank of America was the fifth-largest originator of home loans in the U.S., with a market share of about 7%, according to Inside Mortgage Finance, a trade publication. Countrywide was No. 1, with a market share of 17%, well ahead of No. 2 Wells Fargo & Co., at 10.5%.

After he became chief executive of Bank America in 2001, one of CEO Kenneth D. Lewis's first acts was to remove Bank of America from the subprime-mortgage business. Bank of America cited the risk and volatility of that business. At the time, the bank took a $1.25 billion charge, about half of it tied to subprime loans.

But Mr. Lewis has been eager to build scale in prime mortgage loans. Bank of America, the nation's largest retail bank, with 5,700 branches, hasn't been a major mortgage player, relative to its size. It originated $95 billion in mortgages in the first half of 2007, less than half of Countrywide's $245.13 billion, according to Inside Mortgage Finance.

Bank of America, which reached its coast-to-coast size with a dazzling string of acquisitions, is also bumping up against a regulatory cap that bars any U.S. bank from an acquisition that would give it more than 10% of the nation's total bank deposits. That leaves pursuing more mortgage customers as one of the bank's few potential avenues for growth. Bank research shows that its customers with a mortgage tend to be credit-worthy and profitable, with an average of five accounts at the bank.

[Shrinking Stock]

Bank of America in May rolled out a national "no-fee" mortgage program. Under the program, Bank of America doesn't charge borrowers for loan applications, title insurance, appraisals and flood certifications or require them to get private mortgage insurance -- part of a bid to secure customers' long-term business. To qualify, borrowers must have at least one account with Bank of America and obtain their loan through one of the bank's retail channels.

Elsewhere in the mortgage industry yesterday, the dwindling number of large lenders still active in the market sought to regain their balance. IndyMac Bancorp Inc. said it will resume offering large prime loans known as "jumbo" mortgages, those exceeding the $417,000 ceiling on loans that can be sold to government-sponsored mortgage investors Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

Over the past two weeks, investors have been so spooked by doubts over possible losses on mortgages that they have shunned even relatively high-quality loans simply because they don't carry a Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac guarantee on payments of interest and principal. IndyMac's move is a sign that the market for jumbo loans might be settling down after a spike that has sent rates on 30-year fixed-rate jumbos to an average of around 7.5% from just under 7% in early July, according to HSH Associates, a financial publisher.

IndyMac said it plans to keep the jumbo loans in its portfolio until demand from investors improves.

Countrywide last week outlined a strategy under which it planned to use its Countrywide Bank unit, a federal savings bank, to fund nearly all its loans, up from more than 70% at present. The bank provides a more stable source of funding than the commercial-paper market and other short-term instruments that were the only source of funding for dozens of smaller lenders that have collapsed in recent months. The savings bank also can borrow from the Federal Home Loan Banks, government-sponsored cooperatives.

After announcing the Bank of America investment, Countrywide's Mr. Mozilo said Countrywide would proceed with its plan to rely more heavily on its bank.

Bank of America, which earned $21.1 billion last year, has increasingly been willing to take equity stakes in other companies, agreeing in April to join two private-investment funds and J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. in paying $25 billion for student lender SLM Corp., more widely known as Sallie Mae. The Charlotte, N.C., company also agreed last year to pay $2.5 billion for a 9% stake in China Construction Bank, one of China's Big Four lenders.

Bank of America's Mr. Lewis said in a statement that the $2 billion should prove to be a very profitable investment. "We believe that in the current turmoil the stock market has been underestimating the value in Countrywide's operations and assets," he said.

But Mr. Lewis also said the investment was an important step to restore confidence and liquidity in the nation's credit markets. "This investment reflects our confidence in their business and recognizes the importance of the company in providing home financing across the country," he said.

Write to James R. Hagerty at bob.hagerty@wsj.com, Valerie Bauerlein at valerie.bauerlein@wsj.com and Lingling Wei at lingling.wei@dowjones.com

Weddings Are Not The Budget Drains

Weddings Are Not
The Budget Drains
Some Surveys Suggest
August 24, 2007; Page B1

Tying the knot costs, on average, nearly $30,000 in the U.S. Three major surveys say so, and a spate of news articles this summer and in prior wedding seasons parrot that figure.

But the typical American wedding appears to cost half that, or even less. The surveys reach couples who are likely to have more-expensive weddings than average. Furthermore, the reported numbers are bigger because of how the surveys define "average."

The so-called average cost -- between $27,400 and $28,800, according to the latest iteration of these surveys -- is a mean. That's the kind of average you might remember from grade-school math: In this case, it's the sum of all the survey responses, divided by the number of people surveyed. The mean is especially susceptible to a single lavish exception: One $1 million wedding put into the mix with 54 weddings costing $10,000 each would boost the mean to $28,000, although among the 55 couples, $10,000 would seem a much better representation of the typical cost.

For the three surveys, the median wedding cost is closer to $15,000. The median is the middle figure when you line up a set of numbers in order of size. It is a popular choice for social statistics because it is unperturbed by very small or very large numbers.

WHAT DO YOU THINK?
[Numbers Guy]
Discuss this column on Carl's blog, and read daily dispatches on the numbers behind the news, at WSJ.com/NumbersGuy.

Newlyweds and to-be-weds who respond to the surveys generally are those contacted by the traditional, and traditionally expensive, matrimonial industry. They're more likely to include dozens of elements in their wedding price tags. A couple having a civil ceremony and a no-frills reception is less likely to be found by a big wedding Web site, a bridal-magazine publisher or the maker of wedding invitations -- the groups sponsoring the surveys.

The average wedding last year cost $27,400, according to The Knot Inc.'s email survey in January of 2,014 members of its wedding site, theknot.com, who got married last year. But that group isn't representative of all couples.

Roughly 2.2 million weddings took place last year, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Fewer than 40% of them were members of The Knot, which allows couples to create gift registries and post event information, and to access information on services. And just 40% of members opted to receive email. One-third of those received the wedding survey, and fewer than 2% of those filled it out (a low rate for The Knot, which typically receives 4% to 6% response rates, said a spokeswoman).

The Knot takes steps to ensure that its respondents are representative in terms of geography and household income. But research manager Kristyn Clement acknowledges that The Knot's members may not be typical spenders. "Our market is brides who are planning an actual wedding and putting resources toward that event," Ms. Clement says. "Are there brides who are not spending money on their weddings? Potentially."

Shane McMurray draws survey respondents for his Wedding Report from customers of his Tuscson-based wedding-invitation business, visitors to his costofwedding.com site and other sources. "Is it the best representation" of all couples? Mr. McMurray asks. "Maybe not."

The mean of the latest 1,519 survey responses he has fielded is $28,800, but the median is half that. That's very close to the median figure for The Knot's latest survey: $15,100.

Condé Nast Bridal Media, publisher of the magazines Modern Bride, Elegant Bride and Brides, reports a mean cost of $27,852 from its latest online survey of subscribers and online readers of its magazines, conducted in November 2005. The median cost was $14,182.

Rebecca Mead, staff writer at Condé Nast's New Yorker magazine, writes in her new book, "One Perfect Day: The Selling of the American Wedding," that the survey covered only brides who had made themselves known to the Bridal Group and thereby "already demonstrated an interest in having the kind of wedding that bridal magazines promote."

The surveys have led to other numerical flaws. For instance, Condé Nast's news release about its latest survey trumpeted that the average cost of weddings had nearly doubled, from $15,208, since 1990. That figure was repeated in several news articles. But the 2006 cost of weddings was just $18,057 in 1990 dollars, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics' inflation calculator -- an increase of just 19%, not 100%, in 16 years, or an annual growth rate of under 1.1%.

These cost numbers may help perpetuate themselves, by creating a sense of inevitability for anxious brides and grooms planning their nuptials. "It can confuse and mislead the brides," says Richard Markel, executive director of the Association for Wedding Professionals International.

Ms. Mead, whose own wedding cost was "substantially below" the widely reported numbers, says in an interview that couples who hear the numbers may think, "There's no way around it; there's no alternative. That means, from the perspective of the wedding industry, you have this group of consumers who are resigned to spending a huge amount of money."

Email me at numbersguy@wsj.com. Read daily commentary about numbers and join a discussion with readers at my free blog, WSJ.com/numbersguy.

Tata Head Expresses Interest In Ford's Jaguar, Land Rover

Tata Head Expresses Interest
In Ford's Jaguar, Land Rover

Associated Press
August 24, 2007 1:13 p.m.

NEW DELHI -- The chairman of India's Tata Group said Friday his company is interested in acquiring the Jaguar and Land Rover units of Ford Motor Co.

"We certainly have an interest in that," Chairman Ratan Tata told the CNN-IBN television channel in an interview, excerpts of which were broadcast Friday. Ford, which lost $12.7 billion in 2006, has been looking to sell its Jaguar and Land Rover units.

The Tata Group's interests range from automobiles to steel and software. It has been seeking overseas acquisitions to gain global visibility after thriving for decades in a protected home market. Earlier this year, Tata Steel agreed to pay $12 billion to acquire Britain-based Corus Steel, an acquisition that would make the Indian company the world's fifth largest steel maker.

Mr. Tata said Jaguar and Land Rover could help expand the Tata Motors unit's world-wide reach and reduce its dependence on the Indian market, which accounts for more than 90% of its sales. "It is to give ourselves scale, to give ourselves global reach," he said, declining to comment further.

The company had previously refused to comment on media speculation about a possible Tata bid for the Ford assets. Ford has taken opening bids and has said any sale announcement would not come until late this year or early next year. The company will not comment on potential buyers, spokesman Tom Hoyt said Friday.

Two former Ford executives have reportedly enlisted private-equity firms to make separate bids for Jaguar and Land Rover.

Nick Scheele, who served as Ford's president between 2001 and 2005, has reportedly joined New York-based Ripplewood Holdings LLC to bid for the luxury brands. The other bid has reportedly come from Jacques Nasser, who was Ford's chief executive from 1999 to 2001 and has tied up with One Equity Partners LLC, a private equity firm affiliated with J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.

Copyright © 2007 Associated Press

RELATED ARTICLES AND BLOGS
Related Content may require a subscription | Subscribe Now -- Get 2 Weeks FREE
Related Articles from the Online Journal
Blog Posts About This Topic
AP Headlines | marketplace.publicradio.org
More related content Powered by Sphere

Home Depot Talks

Home Depot Talks
On Unit Get Hostile

Equity Groups Work
To Set Deal; Banks
Challenge Terms
By DENNIS K. BERMAN and HENNY SENDER
August 24, 2007; Page A10

Home Depot Inc. last night was close to accepting about $1.2 billion less for its wholesale distribution business in the sale to three private-equity firms, people familiar with the matter said.

But there were still substantial doubts about whether the deal would close before a deadline yesterday night, as three major banks continued to balk over the financing.

The situation was becoming increasingly ugly, people familiar with the matter said, with some of the most senior figures on Wall Street trying to manage their exposure to a deal beset by twin crises in both the housing and credit markets. The banks -- J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. and Merrill Lynch & Co. -- were last night preparing for the possibility of lawsuits from the private-equity firms over the matter, those people said.

[handshake] MORE ON DEALS
Get all the day's Deal Journal blog posts delivered straight to your inbox: Click here to automatically sign up for the new Deal Journal Newsletter.
Don't miss another deal: Click here to automatically sign up for Deals Alert emails.

People involved in the deal said there was a flurry of negotiations to salvage the transaction, which was originally priced at $10.3 billion by a trio of Bain Capital, Carlyle Group and Clayton, Dubilier & Rice. It was still possible a deal could be struck that satisfies all sides, those people said.

The outcome will be a test of wills between Wall Street and private-equity firms. In recent years, the buyout shops have used their clout to extract sweeter financing terms from the banks. These terms also made it harder for the banks to back out of their financing commitments. Until recently, the banks were happy to oblige, given the lucrative fees that flowed from the buyout groups.

Pinched by the current credit crisis, the banks are toughening their stance against the private-equity firms. With a backlog of some $300 billion of U.S. private-equity deals still to be funded, the banks are now facing significant write-downs on their balance sheets and are weighing how to extract themselves from as many buyout transactions as possible.

It is no accident that the HD Supply deal is the first test of this dynamic. The housing market underpinning its core business -- distributing building materials for new construction -- is in distress. That already has made the $10.3 billion price tag seem high, and the terms of the original debt especially unattractive for the banks.

In this case, the buyers also had leverage on Home Depot, because the Atlanta-based retail giant was counting on the cash to finance its own stock buyback plan.

Home Depot declined to comment. Last week, it said it may have to cut the buyback if the sale doesn't go through.

One bank caught in the middle of the ordeal has been Lehman Brothers, which began as both adviser to Home Depot and a financing source to the buyout group. Such dual roles have become common in buyouts, but the current situation shows how difficult the position can become. Goldman Sachs Group Inc. has since replaced Lehman as Home Depot's financial adviser.

Investors are also concerned about what a scotched deal means for Home Depot. Under new Chief Executive Frank Blake the home-improvement retailer is attempting to turn around its 2,000 stores. Even before slumping housing sales and rising interest rates dampened sales in the home-improvement industry in general, Home Depot was losing market share to its smaller competitor Lowe's Cos.

Shortly after Mr. Blake took the reins at Home Depot, he said his focus would be to refurbish and re-energize the stores. It became clear that selling HD Supply was essential to Mr. Blake achieving the needed turnaround. HD Supply, an amalgam of 40 wholesale construction-supply companies, had drained the company's focus and funds in the past few years.

--Ann Zimmerman contributed to this article.

Write to Dennis K. Berman at dennis.berman@wsj.com and Henny Sender at henny.sender@wsj.com

New York Fed Takes Step To Bolster Credit Market

New York Fed Takes Step To Bolster Credit Market

By Greg Ip
Word Count: 696

In another step aimed at unfreezing the commercial paper market, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York clarified its discount window rules with the effect of enabling banks to pledge a broader range of commercial paper as collateral.

Under the clarification, issued verbally by New York Fed officials to market participants in the last day, banks may pledge asset-backed commercial paper for which they also provide the backup lines of credit.

"This strikes us as a very big deal," said Lou Crandall, chief economist at Wrightson-ICAP LLC. Traditionally, he said, banks did not pledge paper that they guaranteed because this ...

THE FULL WSJ.com ARTICLE IS ONLY AVAILABLE TO SUBSCRIBERS.
IF YOU ARE ALREADY A SUBSCRIBER, PLEASE LOG IN AT THE TOP RIGHT OF THE PAGE.

Home Sales, Factory Orders Offer Encouraging Signs

Home Sales, Factory Orders Offer Encouraging Signs

By Jeff Bater
Word Count: 634

WASHINGTON -- New-home sales unexpectedly climbed during July, but economists expect lurking credit worries to cause further suffering in the housing sector.

A separate report Friday indicated strength in the manufacturing sector of the economy last month, just before the recent credit-market turmoil buffeted financial markets. Durable goods in July surged 5.9%.

Home sales in July defied expectations and stopped sliding. The Commerce Department reported demand for single-family homes increased by 2.8% to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 870,000. Wall Street expected a 1.4% decline. The supply of unsold homes also receded, which is further good news, but inventories ...

THE FULL WSJ.com ARTICLE IS ONLY AVAILABLE TO SUBSCRIBERS.
IF YOU ARE ALREADY A SUBSCRIBER, PLEASE LOG IN AT THE TOP RIGHT OF THE PAGE.

Stocks Rise on Housing, Goods Data; Tech, Energy Shares Lead Surge

Stocks Rise on Housing, Goods Data; Tech, Energy Shares Lead Surge

By Joanna L. Ossinger
Word Count: 1,043 | Companies Featured in This Article: Intel, Apple, Alcoa, Home Depot, Gap, AnnTaylor Stores, Countrywide Financial, Fremont General

Technology shares fueled a broad market surge Friday afternoon amid a backdrop of better-than-expected economic news.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 142.99 to 13378.87, as 29 of its 30 components ended the day higher. The S&P 500 gained 16.87 to 1479.37. The Nasdaq Composite Index was up 34.99, or about 1.4%, to 2576.69.

The Friday rally was encouraging, said Ryan Detrick, chief technical strategist at Schaeffer's Investment Research. He said investors had "stepped up to the plate" and regained confidence in the markets.

Stocks moved higher throughout the session, as investors digested reports on home sales and durable-goods demand, ...

THE FULL WSJ.com ARTICLE IS ONLY AVAILABLE TO SUBSCRIBERS.
IF YOU ARE ALREADY A SUBSCRIBER, PLEASE LOG IN AT THE TOP RIGHT OF THE PAGE.

Earthquake Details & Link Gempa Jawa Barat....!!!

Lihat data nya...!!!

Earthquake Details

Magnitude 7.5
Date-Time
  • Wednesday, August 8, 2007 at 17:04:58 (UTC)
    = Coordinated Universal Time
  • Thursday, August 9, 2007 at 12:04:58 AM
    = local time at epicenter
  • Time of Earthquake in other Time Zones
    Location 5.968°S, 107.655°E
    Depth 289.2 km (179.7 miles)
    Region JAVA, INDONESIA
    Distances 100 km (65 miles) E of JAKARTA, Java, Indonesia
    110 km (70 miles) N of Bandung, Java, Indonesia
    135 km (80 miles) NW of Cirebon, Java, Indonesia
    140 km (85 miles) NE of Sukabumi, Java, Indonesia
    Location Uncertainty horizontal +/- 8 km (5.0 miles); depth +/- 11.2 km (7.0 miles)
    Parameters Nst=170, Nph=170, Dmin=545.1 km, Rmss=1.18 sec, Gp= 36°,
    M-type=moment magnitude (Mw), Version=7
    Source
      USGS NEIC (WDCS-D)
    Event ID us2007fubd
    • This event has been reviewed by a seismologist.


    Lihat beritanya...!!!


    TEN NEW INVESTMENT CONCEPTS, THE TIME HAS COME

    TEN NEW INVESTMENT CONCEPTS, THE TIME HAS COME

       There’s a rumor going around that the Mutual Funds are broken and just can’t work anymore, for a multitude of reasons. They've tried index funds, but these, too, have been less than impressive since they hit the street a few years back, and are now being enhanced... what does that say? Here are some new and/or forgotten ideas that can get your investment program back on track:

       1. Abandon the popular averages: Over the past six years, all of the major averages are grossly negative or just beginning to get back toward their best past levels. At the same time, the NYSE advance/decline line has been extremely positive. Additionally, the last time the averages were up, issue breadth was totally negative.

       2. And the basics of investing, again, are what? Most investors confuse Quality with analyst expectations and think that Diversification means getting one of every product type that’s out there. In fact, they are basic risk minimization tools that every investor needs to use.

       3. Appreciate the power of income: Base Income just has to grow every year, period, for a person to have any hope of keeping up with inflation. That’s right, growing Market Value is inflationary... particularly with respect to hat size, and income paves the road to retirement income.

       4. Buy low (within reason), sell higher: Profitable company stock prices fluctuate just like unprofitable ones. The difference is that the former are much more likely to move back up again. Buy quality at lower prices (just like any other form of shopping), big BUT, set a reasonable (10% or so) profit-taking target... and pull the trigger. Re-load, and do it again.

       5. Embrace The Working Capital Model: For both portfolio Asset Allocation and Performance Evaluation, use the cost basis of your holdings as opposed to their Market Value. This is the only way to use short time periods (a year being the shortest for anything at all meaningful) for any kind of analysis. Also, as a bonus, you’ll never make another fixed income mistake.

       6. Fall in love with Volatility, not with securities of any kind: Market volatility is one of the few things (if there are any at all) that you can be certain about. Use it wisely and it will shorten your road to investment success. All too often, unrealized gains on the loved ones become realized losses on the tax return.

       7. Remember Peak-to-Peak and Trough-to-Trough: There was a time when tests like these (and variations like P to T, or T to P) where the only valid (Market Value) tests of a manager’s ability. They still are. I have never found a correlation between the calendar year and any market, interest rate, or economic cycle.

       8. Corrections are every bit as lovable as rallies: In truth, profit taking is more fun, and much easier decision-making than buying stocks while in the throes of a falling Equity Market. But one is just the flip side of the other, and you need to learn the lyrics to Every Day just as you knew Peggy Sue.

       9. Understand The Investor’s Creed: How did trading get a bad rep? What is a stock exchange? Buy and hold just doesn’t fit. The key is timing (not market timing) and selectivity. In a rising market you should be selling more than buying, resulting in a growing cash position. This is a good thing. In a falling market you should be buying more than selling, resulting in a smaller cash position... also a good thing. If you run out of cash while the market is still falling, you are doing it right. By the same token, if you feel stupid having taken your profits and the market is still foaming, your brilliance will not be your only reward.

       10. Investing is not a competitive event: It’s all about you: your money, your risk tolerance, your goals, and your objectives. It doesn’t matter what the others are doing, why and how. Think about this. There is no average, index, or benchmark that can be compared to the Market Value changes of a properly diversified portfolio. Nadda.

       11. Establish Rules and Apply Discipline... a bonus idea. Just do it.

       Steve Selengut

    LYNCH AND BUFFET METHODS CAN POSE SERIOUS THREATS TO THE AVERAGE INVESTOR

    LYNCH AND BUFFET METHODS CAN POSE SERIOUS THREATS TO THE AVERAGE INVESTOR

       This is a translation of the former paper published by André Gosselin on the OrientationFinance.com web site on June 22 2005 ( Read the original paper in French here).

       The investment strategies of Peter Lynch and Warren Buffett were created with the set of knowledge and experience unique to Peter Lynch and Warren Buffet. What has worked for them may not necessarily work for the average investor.

       * Extract written by André Gosselin published in his book "Investir dans les titres de valeur".

       "To beat the market", "To beat Wall Street", "To beat the Dow-Jones": so many books about investments which promise you to reach this objective which consists in getting a portfolio yield higher than the average. The titles of some of the best-sellers published these last years in the United States are enough to illustrate the importance of this stake in the investor culture: Beating the Street (by Peter Lynch); Beating the Dow (by Michael O' Higgins); The dividend investor: A safe and sure way to beat the market (by Harvey Knowles and Damon Petty); How to retire rich: time-tested strategies to beat the market and retire in style (by James O' Shaughnessy); The Motley fool investment guide: How the fool beats Wall Street's wise men and how you can too (by David and Tom Gardner). So many shock formulas which mean the same thing: add the few points (2 or 3%) to your portfolio return which make the difference between a golden retirement and a retirement dependent on the public system.

       That can sound ridiculous for some people, but the American investors remember the words of Albert Einstein who affirmed that the compounded yields are the greatest discovery of the history of humanity. Here is another example: a yield of 10% per year during 30 years, starting from an initial investment of 10000$, can appear completely acceptable; however, at this rate, the investor ends with an accumulated capital of 174500$ at the time to retire, against 300000$, as it is well known, if he succeeds in reaching a yield of 12% per year rather than 10%. A little 2% more in compounded annual returns that makes a large difference after 30 years. All is relative, would say Einstein, except financial mathematics.

       The small American investors do not lack of models to help implementing their project to beat the market. Warren Buffett, the greatest living legend in the universe of finance and investments, is described like one of the rare Americans to have become billionaire thanks to the stock market. He has one of greatest fortunes of the United States and is preceded only by Bill Gates, the president and founder of Microsoft, who is a personal friend.

       Buffett has never written any book about its investment strategy but so many works and articles have been published about it that we can say that its investment philosophy exerts an enormous influence on the small American investors and their way of managing their portfolios. The personality of Buffett, his simplicity, his modest way of life and his great talent to popularize the art of the stock exchange investment have everything to win their hearts. If the approach of Buffett has enabled him to be multibillionaire, why wouldn't it make it possible to the average investor to be simply billionaire? The myth of Warren Buffett is attracting, but his strategy of investment, as simple as it is, is not within the range of everyone.

       Peter Lynch is another living legend of the investment which was used as a model to thousands of small investors. Manager of the one of the largest mutual funds of the United States (the Fidelity Magellan funds), Lynch has delivered to the shareholders of his funds an yield of more than 20% per year for 10 years during the 80s. He is also the author of three books on the stock exchange which are as many best-sellers and which have contributed to create one of the investment strategies among the most popular in the United States. His books were translated into many languages, in particular in French, German, Japanese, Korean, Swedish and Spanish. Lynch has taken its retirement as manager of the Magellan funds in 1990, but he continues to be very active on the public place and in the so-called investment popular education industry. He regularly grants interviews to the financial magazines the most in sight, and he has even taken part in the creation of a teaching software on the art of the investment in the stock exchange.

       The investment strategy of Peter Lynch or the one of Warren Buffett is conceived for Peter Lynch and Warren Buffett. They are not necessarily made for the average investor. It is a very creditable effort on behalf of these two large investors to popularize, demystify, criticize and transmit to the greatest number of investors the financial knowledge and the elementary principles of the stock exchange investment. But, in my opinion, this is not sufficient to protect or promote the sake of the small investors. The investor who adopts the methods of Lynch or those of Buffett is far from being assured that he will get, all things considered, the same returns as them. He would be wrong to think that he is likely to beat the market if he applies, strictly as they are, the strategies taught or practiced by these two financial authorities. It is not because they worked for Lynch and Buffett that they will be as effective for all the others.

       I have read few critics on the investment strategies of Warren Buffett or Peter Lynch. These people are untouchable, the equivalent of an Abraham Lincoln, a Neil Armstrong or a Michael Jordan. Legendary characters who can't be attacked since they have succeeded. Don't they personify the American dream in all its splendor? Individuals who had started from nothing and who, through work and of eagerness, had climbed to the top of the financial pyramid. In fact, Those characters can hardly be attacked. They are remarkable men, among the most uncorrupted, the most honest, the most accessible and the most qualified from their profession. I agree, their success is phenomenal and deserves the biggest respect.

       Nevertheless, it is necessary to establish a distinction between the individual and his system, to make the difference between the professional and his investment philosophy. The stock exchange analysis and portfolio management methods of Lynch and Buffett represent serious threats to the average investor. It is necessary to shout it loud, and to be quite aware of it. A minority of investors can undoubtedly succeed thanks to these legendary strategies, but I am convinced that the big majority of those who try these singular adventures are on the road to ruin.

       André Gosselin