|                      * Extract written by André Gosselin published in       his book "Investir à l’aide de l’analyse technique".                        The technical analysis strategies, whereas they       are numerous and diversified, are mainly based on the four following       proposals, as stated by Edwards and Magee, authors of Technical Analysis of Stock Trends, by far the       technical analysis book the most read in the world.                        We find in the four following proposals the       essence of what I call the common doctrine of the technical analysis,       which is the oldest and the most widely shared by the technicians:                        1. The value of a security in the market depends       on supply and demand.          2. Supply and demand are controlled by several       factors, some rational and some irrational ones.          3. The market is very efficient and fast to       incorporate, in the price of the securities, all the rational (profits'       annoucements) and irrational factors (rumors, panics, etc.) who       influence the investors.          4. The prices of the stocks evolve according to       trends which appear as well in the very short term as in the very long       term.                 Supply and demand                        The first proposal does not have anything very       revolutionary or eccentric. Almost all the investors, technicians or       not, accept the idea that the price of stocks is determined, among other       factors, by the balance between supply and demand. The question is to       know which weight to give to this factor in his theory or his market       concept.                        The fans of the fundamental analysis and of the       strategies based on the value or the growth of the companies consider       that there are factors more significant than the investors' supply and       demand to judge valuation of a stock. The technicians estimate that it       is the main factor to be taken into account if your objective is to       obtain the maximum return from your investments. In any case, it is the       most accessible and practical factor for the investment decision.                        What is the supply and demand, when these two       phenomena are considered in the financial markets context? The supply is       all the investment decisions which derive from a pessimistic fundamental       analysis of a given stock and from its value; on the contrary, the       demand is made of all the investment decisions which derive from an       optimistic fundamental analysis of a given stock and from its value. All       things considered, the technical analysis is the equivalent of what is       called, in economic science, macroeconomics, because the analyst is       interested first and above all in the aggregate supply and aggregate       demand, i.e. in the offer of all the investors together and in the       demand of all the investors together.                        The rational and the irrational                        The second proposal of the common doctrine of       the technical analysis evokes the idea that the markets are controlled       by individuals who use sometimes their intelligence, and sometimes their       emotions and feelings. Sometimes, the markets seem to evolve roundly and       the investors appear to be guided only by the cold calculation and the       pure intelligence; sometimes, the markets look a sport game, or even a       gambling game, where all the moves are allowed and where the low       instincts dominate. In this last case, it is like attending a race       against the clock, in a zone where a weather alert has been announced,       with the demonstrations of panic, the anxiety, the rescue attempts and       the "deaths" that includes.                        In short, the financial markets demonstrate the       best intelligence and the worst instincts of the mankind. The technical       analysis fans consider that the market is 10% logic and 90%       psychological. The fundamental analysis fans affirm on the contrary that       the market is 90% logic and 10% psychological.                        The markets efficiency                        The third proposal, as you may have noticed, is       a pretty direct charge against the claims of the fundamental analysis.       Several followers of the technical analysis, as I said, do not hesitate       to refer to the scientific authority to fustigate the fundamental       analysis.                        Stan Weinstein for example, the author of a well-known       book about technical analysis and the editor of a very popular financial       letter, write this:                        "You will never be able to beat the market with       constancy by reading today fundamental news in the newspapers and by       acting on the faith of this information. It is a passport for failure, a       small amount of mortal poison that the beginner administers himself       without realizing it [... ] It is not either while following the       economic and financial news that you will turn your investments into       winning bets. In a society saturated with computers and instantaneous       information, the financial markets react to the last developments well       before you are informed about it in the press."                        It is like to read an academic convinced by the       theory of the efficient markets or a researcher buying the conclusions       of one of the many studies showing the uselessness of public       information, accessible to all, at least in an investment strategy which       aims at beating the market.                        To some extent, Weinstein is not wrong. However,       the technicians are proven wrong, when they forget to mention at all one       of the works of the economists on one of the rules of the technical       analysis. They get out of this dead end by affirming, like Weinstein,       that the technical analysis is more about art than science. Their       position is to say that you can make a fortune with the Stock Exchange       by being right only half of the time, or even once out of three times,       considering that you let the profits run and that you cut your losses       quickly. The position of the scientist is to say that a method which       does not work more than once out of two times is not valid.                        Thus, the two sides have different criteria to       judge a method: the scientist will say that it is valid if it succeeds       at least more than once out of two, the technical analyst will say that       it is not necessary that a method succeeds more than once out of two and       that it is acceptable and useful as long as it brings back enough money       to who follows it.                        The prices trend                        The fourth proposal of the technical analysis       common doctrines is the most significant. As Martin Pring, author of Technical Analysis Explained, explains, the       objective of the technical analysis is to determine the changes or the       reversals in the stock prices, thanks in particular to indicators and       simple mathematical ratios on the state and the economic situation of       the markets. The markets evolve in trends, in a given direction, either       upwards, or downwards; sometimes flat, as if the market has taken a       pause and that       the investors have entered in a phase of indecisiveness.                        These intermediate periods have their importance       for certain technicians, because, as soon as the market takes a clearer       direction, with upwards or downwards, it is possible to take position in       order to take the train on time. It is all about the art, the difficult       one, of the technical analysis.         | 
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar